Mercurial: How to deal with one branch that has two heads
What if one branch has two heads? I came to this situation weeks ago for some reason I didn’t merged them back then and just continued developing on one head. Now I want to get rid of the other head. What should I do? Should I just merge them after so many changesets?
- How does 'git log --graph' or 'hg graphlog' work?
- For home projects, can Mercurial or Git (or other DVCS) provide more advantages over Subversion?
- How to import a deleted path in a svn repositroy into git or mercurial
- Git, Hg or Bzr — Which to recommend to a new user?
- What are the benefits of Mercurial or git over svn for branching/merging?
- How can I automatically add a datestamp field to a java class marking a commit date
3 Solutions collect form web for “Mercurial: How to deal with one branch that has two heads”
So you have this:
o--o--o--A--B <- older unnecessary head \ 1--2--3--4--5--6 <- newer ‘good’ head
…and you don’t need
B, absolutely, 100% sure. If you aren’t sure, and there are possibly salvageable things in
B, better merge the heads to combine the changes. As Aaron said, Mercurial is good at it.
Now you have two options:
- get rid of the old head, or
- do a dummy merge of two heads that ignores head
B are present in other repositories you don’t control, e.g. if other people pulled
B into their repositories, or you pushed
B to a public repository (say, Bitbucket), then you’ve released
B into the wild, and can’t get rid of them. You should do a dummy merge:
$ hg up 6 $ hg --config ui.merge=internal:local merge
This will ignore any changes from
B when merging.
If, on the other hand,
B are private, you can either strip them:
$ hg strip A
A and descendants stripped; enable the MQ extension to make
Or, make a new clone of your repository without changesets
$ hg clone myrepo myrepo2-clone -r 6
6 and ancestors added to the clone.)
A head is created if you commit some changes (add a changeset to an existing changeset). If that happens several times for the same changeset, then several heads are created. This is nothing unusual or bad.
The usual solution is to merge them. Mercurial is very good at merging. Chances are that the result will still compile and run without any manual work.
hg merge and then
hg status and
hg diff to see what changed between the two. If you like the result, commit it. If you don’t like it,
update to either head to clean your workspace.
To get rid of a head, the docs explain how to do that.
Using MQ, you can also turn the second head into an independent branch (so you can keep it around but it won’t bother you). See this answer: How can I create a branch for a non-tip revision in Mercurial?
If you need to keep the changes on the old branch, you should merge them, and it should not be a problem.