`git branch –list` returns files?
So this is my script:
for br in `git branch -l`; do git checkout $br git rebase origin/master done
Simple. But before I made the script, I wanted to make sure that `git branch -l` returns what I think it is returning…..it isn’t.
git branch -l returns the correct result. But `git branch -l` is actually returning all local branch PLUS the files in the current dir!
It returns it like this:
[list of local branches minus master] [list of files in the current dir] master
`git branch –list` behaves the same way.
Why is this happening?
And is there a better way to rebase origin/master to all local branches?
2 Solutions collect form web for “`git branch –list` returns files?”
This is kind of a silly thing.
git branch –list is putting an asterisk in front of the currently selected branch; your shell script is interpreting that as the wildcard and adding the files in the current directory to the list of items to traverse with your for loop.
You can try
for br in `git branch -l | tr '*' ' '`; do git checkout $br git rebase origin/master done
The other thing you can do, not really needed here but useful for more robust scripts as it were, is to use
git for-each-ref to extract the refnames you want. For instance, the equivalent of
git branch --list minus the prefix white-space-or-asterisk is:
$ git for-each-ref refs/heads/ --format='%(refname:short)'
as in this example:
$ git branch -a * master remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master remotes/origin/master $ git for-each-ref refs/heads/ --format='%(refname:short)' master
Likewise you can get remotes (
git branch -r) by using
refs/remotes/ instead of
refs/heads/, and you can find tags using
refs/tags/. There are even extra options with
for-each-ref designed to protect strings from various program actions (not needed for this particular case, see the documentation for
git check-ref-format and its restrictions on branch names), but which make it possible to use
eval on the output of